Agmates editor Steve Truman writes:
An international conference on water resources has been warned of worldwide food shortages unless more land is cleared for agriculture. French hydrologist, Emeritus Professor Ghislain de Marsilysays soil and ecosystems will become more of a worldwide concern than access to water.
He says Asia and Africa will move toward having no land left for conservation because it will be needed for crop production, and other continents will also have to help meet Asian food demand. Read that story Crops More Important than Forests here.
Recently we reported that USA farmers were pulling 6 million acres of land out of conservation reserves to put into cropping grain. I’ve had a number of people as “how does that work”.
Thousands of farmers are taking their fields out of the US government’s biggest conservation program, which pays them not to cultivate. The Conservation Reserve program was conceived as part of the 1985 Farm Bill. Farmers bid to put their land in the program during special sign-ups, with the government selecting the acres most at risk environmentally.
US farmers receive average annual payments of $51 an acre. Contracts run for at least a decade and are nearly impossible to break - not that anyone wanted to until recently.
The program peaked late last summer, with more than 400,000 farmers receiving nearly $1.8 billion for idling 36.8 million acres. Read full details here.
It’s interesting to note that the USA government pays its farmers an average of US$51 per acre to put at risk environments in conservation reserves for 10 years. Now when its needed to produce food for the world it can be brought back into production. Now thats smart.
This isn’t -
Compare that to the Australian Federal & State Governments. Through State Government Native Vegetation Legislation “Total Tree Clearing bans” Australia has locked up 76,000 million acres of productive rural land forever. Whats more it has been done without a scrap of compensation being paid to the landholders.
Will History Judge these two men as Environmental Champions or Leaders Guilty of Mass Genocide?
Thats a provocative question, but it is fair enough in this unprecedented time in history that we live in. Food riots, global food shortages, it becomes a moral dilemma for all citizens of the world.
The question that must be dealt with is ‘Whats more important, trees or human suffering and the potential extinction of millions of people in poor and 3rd world nations’?
Perhaps a statistician may one day calculate how many people in the world that Australian land if farmed may have fed.
As the world wide population continues to grow at 200,000 people a day by the year 2030 someone may then be able to calculate just how many people world wide former NSW and QLD premiers Bob Carr (NSW pictured above right) and Peter Beattie (QLD above left) have either starved to death or consigned to a miserable life of poverty and hunger through legislation that has locked up millions of acres of good faming land for conservation.
————————————————————–
Update No1: 25th April 11.20am
Researchers at the Institute For Rural Futures at the University of New England, have put estimates on the payments Australian farmers would expect if they are to manage their land in an environmentally sustainable way.
The researchers surveyed dozens of farmers in the New South Wales Walgett region. Program leader Dr Ian Patrick says it is an important step for government and private enterprise that will have to share the cost of reimbursing farmers for changing their land practices.
The study found that for basic grazing land while still running some stock on it graziers would need $10 per acre/per year (AUD$25/HA), to manage their land in perpetuity for conservation. For cropping country, it would be $80 per acre/ per year (AUD$200/HA).
————————————————————–
Have Your say!
Leave your comment below or click on the Blue word Comments and the reply box will appear.









