2
Vote up Vote down

Cattle live export is the life blood of the NT cattle Industry.

Northern Territory grazier Rashida Khan writes:

I am sick of hearing from self styled environmentalists, animal rights campaigners and other highly emotive anti-farm people, who whine in the spotlight and yet offer no viable solutions or alternatives to the issue they are raising.

I feel the need to comment on the Anti Live Export movement. Live Export represents the sole market for many northern graziers like my family. If this is stopped, then what do the animal lobbyists suggest graziers do with our cattle?

That’s me in the photo below on my horse mustering at our place near Batchelor in the Northern Territory. 

Rashida Khan - NT Grazier

Most of our beef goes to Indonesia; the animals are held in feedlots and then slaughtered according to consumer demand. Refrigeration is not wide spread in much of Indonesia and Live Export means people can still have access to high quality protein in their diet.

We can’t afford to import or grow grain for feedloting and our slaughter houses have all closed one after the other, leaving northern graziers with limited marketing options.

Photo of our Brahman and Brahman cross steers ready to go to the live Export trade. 

Live Export Brahman x Steers

Darwin is closer to Indonesia than it is to Alice Springs, Townsville or Adelaide. When exported our cattle are traveling for the minimum amount of time, they gain weight on the boat (a sign of unstressed healthy animals) and they are handled carefully when they arrive. Unfortunately, you don’t see any film crews watching the cattle walk calmly off a boat, or photos of healthy cattle chewing their cuds mid voyage.

Photo of our Brahman cross breeders with calves at foot in the paddock. 

Brahman cross cows with calves

Here’s something to ponder. If live export stops; then cattle will have to be sent interstate.

-To minimize stress they will have to stay loaded till they reach their destination which means traveling unnecessary long distances without feed or water.

-How will we fill the current labour shortage to slaughter and process these cattle?

-Who will build facilities to accept cold stores in Indonesia? Remembering that currently 80% of beef is bought in the wet market

-What will happen to the Indonesian feedlot industry when they have feedlots but no cattle? They will buy elsewhere of course. Our biggest competitor, Brazil, will step up to the plate with cheaper beef and to address the new market they will log some more of the Amazon Jungle. This means Aussies out of jobs and monkeys out of trees.

When the lobbyists have answers and plausible alternatives to Live Export then they should state their case. I suspect that if they succeed in stopping Live Export, the lobbyists will be like the dog that finally caught the motor car!

Have Your Say! Should the federal government cave into pressure from animal rights groups and ban all Live Exports of Cattle and sheep from Australia? Leave your thoughts or questions for Rashida. Click on the Blue word Comments below and type your comment.

Related Posts

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

Comment by Katie Subscribed to comments via email
2008-05-25 00:45:03

You paint a rosy picture of live exports. Unfortunately in real life, your picture is a myth. We are well aware of the number of animals which die on the ships of shame. 40,000 last year though it was some 75,000 around 2002. But your leaders talk in “one percent.”

The majority were sheep but then overall, sheep predominated. I am afraid to say the industry you are in has no room for ethics - only profits. When a ban was placed on live exports overseas, the chilled and frozen meat exports increased. Yes and also to those countries which you claim “lack” refrigeration.

Furthermore, the billions of tonnes of animal faeces and urine, dead and diseased bodies chucked overboard, contaminating our oceans is not funny and that you are trashing Australia’s environment where cattle emit millions of kilograms of methane, just to send them overseas for maximum profits is bereft of morality.

Greenhouse is not 50 years away but now. Time for you to consider growing something else, I’m afraid.

What about opening a couple of abattoirs then you can keep your live animals in a humane environment prior to slaughter? With Australia’s “clean green” image, I assure you the Brazilians wont have much chance with their foot and mouth image and if the Indonesians say they lack refrigeration but can afford your meat then that is tough!

Enough spin from your industry. We are well informed and fair-minded citizens in a nation which has resorted to barbaric practices for maximum profits. You will have to learn the hard way.

 
Comment by Ross Newman Subscribed to comments via email
2008-05-26 16:21:05

Katie,
Can you please suggest to all the readers of Agmate’s what we should grow in northern Australia, to fill the growing world demand for food? I like many other people involved in rural Australia are more than willing to hear the thoughts of “well informed and fair-minded citizens”.

The solution that you present should provide a positive income to the northern communities of Australia, be sustainable, be able to be utilised both domestically as well as providing benefit to the world population, and most importantly be as carbon neutral as possible.

You talk about the thousands of tonne of methane the livestock industry emits, but how much carbon do we stored each year as well.

I surely look forward to hearing your thoughts, maybe they may be so good that Steve might even make a story out of it. What do you reckon Steve!!!

Comment by Agmates Subscribed to comments via email
2008-05-26 16:40:40

G’day Ross,

Yes I’d be thrilled too. When ever your ready Katie.

I , Agmates readers across the country and Federal and State policy makers await your suggestions and thoughts.

If you are submitting a detailed presentation - please submit it via the Contact Us link at the bottom of the page.

 
 
Comment by Rashida Khan Subscribed to comments via email
2008-05-29 20:32:32

Hello Katie

I hear your comments and am glad to hear that you rare in touch with the media. However I am in touch with the people who breed the cattle, sell the cattle, travel with the cattle, unload the cattle and market the cattle. I am connected to the people who buy the cattle over there and also have traveled to Asia and seen a wet market and the public in action.

As to your comment on the Brazilians it should be noted that the largest “Australian” meat processors are owned by a Brazilian company.

Australia has spent a lot of our money improving the way other people perceive animal welfare Unfortunately Australian beef growers are verbally bashed buy the ill-informed who watch the news and see an animal abused which would not pass Australian standards to be exported. Yet here at home we are apparently to blame.

I wish there were more abbatiors in the NT as well. Unfortunately our government is not in support of the beef industry at this point which is very sad.

As to pollution next time you drive your imported car (which came to Australia by boat) to your local supermarket, read the cans and plastic packages of you groceries and when the kids sit in front of the imported plastic TV on the Malaysian Timber furniture or when you turn off the grid system electric light please think of me in my office which is run by solar, at my aussie Jarrah desk, with my horse outside the window and my farting (methane emitting) cows in the paddock which are exported in the name of trade balance so that you may indulge in the modern ways.

I assure you what you are quoting could well be on A Current Affair (if fact it was a few months back)
However I am living a much tougher existence than you so that you may enjoy many different convenience’s and if you want to deal Aussie graziers a kick in guts then feel free but remember at the bottom of every food chain is a producer and people must eat.

If you want to start the abbatiors in the NT then you have my full support.

My article was to show the “other side” of the story, and maybe what you see on TV is not always what is going on on the land. We are people with our heart and soul invested in this, we are not a bunch of barbaric hooligans out for a buck.

You may think I’m talking Aussie farmers up but I believe they are unsung bloody heroes! And its about time they got a mention instead of a kick in the guts!

yours sincerely
Rashida Khan

 
Comment by John Michelmore Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-01 11:24:07

It is so easy to perceive what we read, see and hear in the media as a well balanced look at what goes on in the world today; unfortunately nothing could be further from the truth. Media is driven by sensationalism and money, nothing else. The days of independent main stream journalism are gone.
Yes, we all know that cattle produce methane, so lets stop grazing cattle and find another income stream for Australia. Lets dig another hole in the ground and sell its contents overseas.
One must face the fact that we ALL have changed the environment in Australia. It isn’t just going to go back to what it was before white settlement, no matter what we do. We can only now manage what we have to the best of our ability. It is easy to blame farmers for today’s problem, or to expect them to carry the cost of climate change, the lack of abbatoirs in Australia, the loss of native vegetation; the list is endless. It is so easy to blame a minority, when we ALL have a responsibilty.
If we think about it, what choice do we have now that most land in Australia has been converted to farming land, the plant species altered to maximise production, fertilizer use etc etc.
So we stop grazing cattle in the northern parts of Australia. What then, do we let the insect species that produces more methane than cattle consume the grass (white ants)? Do when then try and control the white ants?
Maybe we can just burn all that organic matter, is that the solution? All that smoke could help reflect some sunlight back into space and reduce climate change!!
Alternatively farmers just walk off the land and let nature take over. Will the native animals and plants return or will the feral camels, horses, water buffalo, pigs, dogs and cats; and all those non-native plants take over. What do you think would happen?
Still WE can still blame the farmers, they should have stayed on the land and cared for it without the income that the rest of us have.
All this highlights is the need for Australian’s to work together for the advancement of the country, with suggestions and actions on how we can improve the situation. Criticism without some suggestion on viable alternatives, can only make the situation worse for Australia.

Comment by Agmates Editor Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-01 11:39:30

G’day John,

Mate you are correct in what you are saying. People like our Katie are high on rhetoric but have no answers.

Most of these people like Katie have never been to the outback or the bush, but all will tell you what terrible people farmers are.

You just have to face it that there is a green minority out there who just don’t care about farmers or humanity for that matter. I think and others will know better than I that they really believe planet earth can only sustain about a billion people. The remaining 5 billion population of the earth should be just left to starve to death to bring the planet back into balance with ‘mother nature’.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post